Discussion about this post

User's avatar
KSwearingen's avatar

This does a great job of explaining the experience of striking out on your own and providing some grace rather than condemning the patterns. I definitely went through this experience! (Sue! Where were you??) :)

There is a section that I want to highlight because I think it says something deeper: "Inside, your title gave people a reason to listen." In the corporate world, that is a completely valid statement. We all know it is true and skim past it.

I want to encourage people to stop right there to examine the assumption behind that practice. We are conditioned to believe that someone's title is indicative of experience and/or judgment. It should be the truth. Unfortunately, the data says that it is not. (We don't actually need the data to know that; we can just look around.)*

That obviously isn't a popular thing to say but that misalignment is a major contributor that I've seen in professionals choosing to strike out on their own. With that though, I think Sue's next statement reads differently: "Outside, your evidence, positioning and offer have to do that work." If you keep the understanding hiding behind the first statement, the second becomes easier to see and less daunting to tackle.

*I elaborate on decisions around judgment exhaustively, but that is not the point here.

Immanuel Santosh's avatar

The 'control tower' idea maps directly onto Indian salaried professionals' finances.

Most rely on EPF, PPF and NPS as their external structure — then struggle when they go independent and must build their own systems.

The ninety-day destination works for financial goals too, and the weekly flight plan mirrors SIP discipline.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?